logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.05.19 2015고단124
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) destroyed property damage: (b) on the ground that, around 00:20 on November 10, 2014, the Defendant: (c) destroyed the road on the street in front of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul; (d) Non-registration No. 125C, PCX, which was operated by the victim C (year 31) and under the victim C (year 31); (c) Non-registration No. 125C, PCX; (d) the victim’s ownership, by walking down the left side of the Oratob, so that the front front of the Oratobab, and then damaged the property equivalent to KRW 1,234,000 at the market price, such as where the damaged part of the Patobab is fluor and the lower part of the pentababababab.

The defendant continued to run away from the off-side side of the victim C's PCX, which was parked on the left side of the left side, and caused the damage of the damage of the damage amounting to KRW 546,920 on the back side of the driver's seat of the E-car owned by the victim D (the age of 36) and the damage of the damage amounting to KRW 546,920.

2. For the reasons stated in the above 1. Paragraph 1., the injured Defendant inflicted injury on the victim’s face, such as 14-day catum catum cathers, when she went back the victim’s body head, and re-satisfys the victim’s body, and re-satisfys the victim’s body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has a record of having been sentenced to a fine once for the same crime, and that the victim C who passed without any particular reason assaults the victim C and did not make any effort to recover from damage even though the stoba and the car were damaged is disadvantageous to the defendant.

(b).

arrow