A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of causing bodily injury resulting from forced indecent conduct at the Suwon District Court’s Branch Branch on May 30, 2014, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of false accusation at the Daegu District Court’s Branch Branch on May 30, 2014, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment on November 9, 2015.

On January 11, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of conflict at the Suwon Friwon method, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 6, 2018.

[2] On December 23, 2017, from around 23:5 to December 00:15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was placed in the front of Suwon-si B in front of Suwon-si; and (b) was placed in the front window of the said taxi by the victim C while stopping at that place; (c) was placed in the front window of the said taxi; and (d) was the victim with the victim’s “new feass of both feas, personal cabs, and killed.”

“Absing the part of the instant taxi by drinking, such as “Abstin,” which prevented customers who were trying to board the taxi from getting on the taxi by drinking, and thereby interfered with their taxi business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Voluntary accompanying reports and investigation reports (on-site conditions, etc.);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, reports on investigation (report attached to the judgment, etc.), reporting of the past convictions in disposition, and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code to treat concurrent crimes, but the reason for sentencing Article 39(1) of the Criminal Code to the crime of this case is that the defendant interfered with the taxi business by leaving the taxi in front of the taxi where the defendant stops on the road, and thus the nature of the crime is not easy, and the victim wants to punish the defendant, and the defendant has been punished six times prior to the crime of this case, and has the record of being punished for several crimes, including having been punished for interference with his duties, and the period of repeated crime due to the crime of this case.