logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.12.12 2017누64301
의사면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment in this case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding “(the Constitutional Court Order 2017HunBa355 Decided September 28, 2017)” to “the petition for a constitutional complaint filed by the plaintiff against the provision of this case was dismissed for the same reason” (the Constitutional Court Order 2017HunBa355 Decided September 28, 2017). Therefore, this shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow