logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.11.21 2018고단2562
전기통신금융사기피해금환급에관한특별법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and two months, and for defendant B, for two years and six months, and for defendant C, for one year and two months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants participated in the licensing organization through the name influent women (E), etc., of the organization of the licensing organization operated by the General Book D, and then discovered financial information necessary for Internet banking by having the victims contact with the public prosecutor belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office or prosecutor's investigator under the above E, etc., and then let the victims transfer the victims' money to the management account, thereby allowing the victims to receive performance rates at the rate of 5 to 10% out of the amount of damage. The other influent employees of the name were established on the website of the Public Prosecutor's Office, and opened the so-called "influent book" in which the victims came to withdraw the amount of damage remitted by the victims.

On January 23, 2015, the Defendants and the employees engaged in phishing, in the name of 11:21,000 China, called to the victim F (n, 57 years old), and misrepresented to the investigation officers and G prosecutor’s offices in Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office by misrepresenting the victim F (n, e.g., the 57 years old) to commit fraud.

Since the details of the head of the Tong must be confirmed, money should be deposited into the account.

“Falsely speaking, and allowing a victim to enter the Internet banking ID, password, etc. by informing the mining site (H) created similar to the public prosecutor’s office website to verify the list of the case, and return money if it is confirmed as the details of the ordinary passbook transaction by sending money to the account notified by us.

“As if the investigation was conducted, the victim was arrested by sharing the role of prosecutor and investigator as if the investigation were conducted.”

Therefore, it is the name of the victim I.

arrow