logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2020.10.15 2020도960
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Article 8(1) of the Act on the Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment (hereinafter “the Regulation of Criminal Proceeds Concealment”) provides that “criminal proceeds” may be forfeited. Article 2 subparag. 2(b)1 of the Act on the Regulation of Criminal Proceeds Concealment provides that “funds or property related to a crime provided for in Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (limited to the act of providing funds, land, or buildings knowing the fact that they are provided for sexual traffic among the acts of arranging sexual traffic) as one of “criminal proceeds” provided for in the above Act. Article 2(1)2 of the Act on the Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment provides “an act of providing funds, land, or building despite being aware of the fact that they are provided for sexual traffic, acts of offering money, land, or building with awareness of the fact that they are provided for sexual traffic” includes acts of arranging or soliciting sexual traffic, soliciting, soliciting, or compelling another person to confiscate or prosecute a building (see Article 2(1)2(a) of the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. 9.

2. According to the records, the following circumstances are revealed. A.

The defendants share their respective roles and conduct the business of arranging sexual traffic and divide the profits of all business establishments.

arrow