Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the prosecutor (unlawful in sentencing) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant recognized the facts of the crime in this case as a whole; (b) it seems that the profits directly acquired by the crime in this case are not significant; and (c) the defendant has yet to be young and has no record of the previous crime in this case; (d) it is recognized that the crime in this case is connected to the so-called so-called phishing crime with a large social harm; (b) the defendant is not in itself a good quality; and (c) the defendant took over and stored a large number of access media by participating in withdrawal and remittance; and (d) other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the situation after the crime, etc., the defendant and the prosecutor's assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.