logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.29 2017나59461
금형제작비
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s relationship 1) The Plaintiff is a corporation that runs the business of producing gold and voltageing, etc., and the Defendant is a corporation that runs the business of installing and selling Changho Lake. 2) The Defendant carried out the “Canadian Amera Project” (hereinafter “instant project”) that exports title to Canada from March 2013 to November 2013.

The Plaintiff produced the profiling file(s) that is the subject of the Defendant’s export of the project in the instant case. To produce the profiling, the prilx was used to prevent the transformation of gold and gold type from producing the profiling file.

피고는 원고에게 王자 금형의 제작을 의뢰하기도 하였는데, 王자 금형도 위 spray box가 사용되는 대상이다.

B. WIN-01 is a gold-related process 1) The defendant, who attempted and suspended the project of the instant case, is a stock company melter (hereinafter referred to as “FU”) which was suspended.

(2) On February 18, 2013, 200, 2000 won was paid as advance payment during the melting season by the Defendant using the gold mold, etc., and the Plaintiff sent the Plaintiff the revised drawing of the gold mold as seen above on February 18, 2013. On February 19, 2013, the melting machine sent the revised drawing of WIN-01 gold mold and the following day. The Plaintiff was the “gold special steel Co., Ltd. hereinafter referred to as the “gold special steel”).

(3) Around March 14, 2013, the Defendant received a gold-type design drawing from the Plaintiff and then selected the initial WIN-01 design drawing from the Plaintiff and sent it to the Plaintiff. On March 15, 2013, the Defendant again selected the final WIN-01 design drawing among the design drawings received from the Plaintiff and sent it to the Plaintiff.

4 The Defendant received profilings from the Plaintiff and filed an export declaration to send windows to Canada around March 29, 2013, and the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff all the amount of the profilings.

5 A dispute arises between the defendant and the convergence.

arrow