Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2018, at around 00:01, the Defendant reported on 112 the content that “the son was on duty at the Han River Park-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, which was located in the Han River basin, 96, that he was called “the son was on duty,” and used the Defendant’s desire to read “The son, Ho-ho, Ma-ho, Ma-ho,” and used the Defendant to read “the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and D;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the defendant assaults a police officer on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and there is a need to strictize such interference with the execution of official duties.

The defendant makes a confession and reflects on the crime, and the degree of exercising his tangible power is relatively minor.

The fact that money has been deposited to police officers or the criminal record has not been committed.

In consideration of these factors, the same type as the order shall be determined.