The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal in this case is that the traffic accident of this case was almost contacted with the body of the victim set up in order to prohibit the victim from parking with the vehicle of the defendant at the same time, and it was true that the defendant was scambling at that time, or that the defendant was thought to have scambling only with water. As at the time, the defendant did not have the awareness of the occurrence of the accident. Accordingly, the defendant had no awareness of the occurrence of the accident at that time while moving 40 meters from the scene of the accident while the witness was scambling and stopped from the scene of the accident, and was the scene where the witness was scambling and

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous in misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the court below and the court below duly adopted and examined the evidence, namely, ① the defendant found a place where the defendant was parked in a singing room after drinking and drinking alcohol, and had a right of defense of the defendant. After the right of defense of the defendant, the part of the defendant's vehicle was shocked to the right of the vehicle and suffered bodily injury (the facts charged in this case and the criminal facts of the court below stated that "the victim D's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's k's k's k's k's k'.