The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Since the summary of the facts charged does not substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his right to defense, the facts charged are organized as follows.

The Defendant, from January 17, 201 to December 31, 2013, is a person who has overall control over the research institute’s affairs while working in the president of the F Research Center in Ansan-si. On March 29, 2011, the Defendant obtained confirmation of a waste disposal plan with the content that he/she will entrust the disposal of 1,33k [16 tons in a year (8 tons in a high weight, 8 tons in an amount)] average of 1,33kg [16 tons in a year)] of designated wastes, and then did not obtain confirmation of an average of 1,800kg [21.6 tons in a year (21.6 tons in a high weight, 9.17 tons in a large amount)] from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 from the competent administrative authority, even if the average volume of designated wastes increases by 30/100 or more of the average monthly discharge.

2. Determination

A. A prosecutor under Article 66 subparag. 4 of the Wastes Control Act does not prosecute the Defendant on the grounds that Article 67 of the Wastes Control Act, which is a joint penal provision, is a applicable provision of Article 67, and charged the Defendant with the applicable provision of Article 66 subparag. 4 and Article 17(4) of the Wastes Control Act. Upon submitting a written opinion on November 12, 2014, the purpose of the indictment is more clearly indicated. The phrase “a person who discharges, transports, or treats controlled wastes, is punished, and Article 17(3) of the same Act provides for “a person who discharges, transports, or disposes of controlled wastes,” and Article 17(4) of the same Act provides for “a person who has obtained confirmation under Article 66 subparag. 4 of the Wastes Control Act, which is a penal provision, is the subject of an obligation under Article 17(4) of the same Act, which is a separate provision, and “an individual person’s right” and “an individual person’s right” is the subject of interest.

B. In this case, health expenses, rights, obligations and profits.