1. The defendant is calculated by the ratio of 30,000,000 won to 20% per annum from June 6, 2013 to the day of complete payment.

If Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (the document’s seal affixed on the document’s seal is affixed to the document’s seal, barring any special circumstance, the authenticity of the document is presumed to have been established, i.e., the act of affixing the seal based on the will of the person who prepared the document’s seal. Once the authenticity of the document is presumed to have been established, the document’s authenticity is presumed to have been established pursuant to Article 329 of the Civil Procedure Act. There is no dispute over the fact that the following seal affixed on the above loan’s name is affixed by the defendant’s seal, and the document’s authenticity is presumed to have been established. Although the defendant asserted to the effect that wife forged the document by affixing the defendant’s seal without the defendant’s permission, it is insufficient to acknowledge the above assertion solely with the statement of evidence Nos. 5 and 8, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise, the plaintiff’s obligation to pay 30 million won to the defendant on December 4, 2012 to the plaintiff on March 4, 20000.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.