1. The Plaintiff, and Defendant A’s 10,822,363 won and its comparison with Defendant B, from June 4, 2013, and Defendant B, from 88,399 won and its comparison with the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 30, 2009, the Plaintiff contracted the E-school extension and gymnasium repair work (hereinafter “instant construction work”) from May 4, 2009 to September 1, 2009, and paid as advance payment the construction cost of KRW 419,103,070 (the increased amount was KRW 420,623,070, but was reduced to KRW 393,416,000 at the time of completion).

B. The Plaintiff was served by the creditors of D with the decision of provisional attachment, seizure, etc. (hereinafter “instant provisional attachment, etc.”) regarding D’s claim for the construction price against D (hereinafter “instant claim for construction price”) as indicated in the table below.

Serial 1 A. 287,416,438 on June 30, 2009, the date of delivery of the claims by creditors 2F provisional seizure 7,020,000 on July 10, 209, and 3 G provisional seizure 30,000,000 on September 9, 209, the National Pension Service of 11, 139,500. 36. National Pension Service of 208. 12,017,017,6. 6. 208. 12,017,670,670, and collection on October 6, 2009; 30,000,000 from July 10, 2009;

D On August 16, 2009, the Corporation paid 90,240,000 won for windows, metals, and glass construction among the instant construction works to new companies (corporate registration number 22411-011-01474; hereinafter referred to as “non-party 1 new companies”) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “non-party 1 new companies”), and the Non-party 1 and Defendant 1,740,000 won for the Non-party 1 to the Non-party 30,240,000 in price for the Defendant Dorh (hereinafter referred to as “Dongh-dorology”), and for the Non-party 1,740,000 won in price for the Non-party 1 and the Non-party 2 to the Defendant Kusung Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Seosung Construction”).