A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 14:50 on March 21, 2017, the Defendant driven a B-type truck without a driver’s license from approximately 3 km section of approximately 3km to the front road of the 3rd village hall in the 3rd city of the same Eup from the influent land of not more than 2 m of the Eup to the 4rd village hall in the same Eup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Report on occurrence of a suspected violation of traffic laws (unlicensed) and voluntary accompanying of the suspected victim, and report on internal investigation (e.g., details of the control of unauthorized licenses);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the motor vehicle driver's license ledger, mandatory insurance inquiry, and next inquiry;

1. Article 152 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act that choose a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime of non-licenseing even though he committed two times the crime of drinking and non-licenseing for the reason of sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

However, the court shall take into account the favorable circumstances in which the defendant acknowledges and reflects a crime, and shall determine the punishment as ordered by taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments and records of this case.