The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

30,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the addiction of narcotics and the harm caused by the administration of narcotics, etc., it is necessary to strictly punish and eradicate a person who committed the narcotics, and the Defendant is holding a philopon remaining philopphones after he purchases or receives free of charge from F.

Considering the risk of being derived from the defendant's occupation, which is a taxi driver, not only a large volume of handling but also the case exposed to the danger of being exposed to the defendant's occupation, the test result shows that the degree of the victim's philopism addiction seems not to be easy in light of the fact that the defendant's philopism addiction occurred from the reaction. The defendant did not know while he was prosecuted for the narcotics of this case, causing the victim's death and assault the victim P and Q, including eight times of punishment, and the defendant was sentenced to punishment on several occasions including the crime of injury on November 24, 2010, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months for the crime of injury on November 24, 2010, and again committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime. However, while the defendant has been sentenced to punishment for a minor violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., the defendant has no record of criminal punishment as a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the defendant has made a relatively agreed with the victim's P and Q.