A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below in light of the above legal principles and records, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to Article 13(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. In so doing, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on free evaluation of evidence, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. It did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on free evaluation of evidence, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. It did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to free evaluation of evidence, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal, contrary to what is alleged in the ground of appeal.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around March 29, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from the singishing staff (one-time “B”) on the name and incom with the mobile phone app from the singishing staff (one-time “B”) to collect money and transfer money to the account that received; (b) subsequently, the Defendant conspired to commit the act of collecting cash from the singishing organization to share the said singishing organization’s role as a “cash collection book”; and (c) subsequently, the Defendant subsequently conspired to commit the act of collecting cash.”

On March 31, 2020, according to the above public offering, the employees of the scaming scam scam scam scam scamscams from the victim C by phone to the Financial Supervisory Service, and “on the present financial assets.” If so, 25 million won must be repaid. It is possible to grant cash loans from the D bank.”