beta
Text
The judgment below
Of the defendants A, the part of the defendant is reversed.
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A’s sentence (10 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
B. Defendant B and C’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 120 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. Defendant A’s crime of this case needs to be strictly punished because it has a great impact on society by inducing a speculative spirit and undermining good morals.
The Defendant appears to have led to the instant crime, compared to the other Defendants, as the business owner operating the instant game room.
However, the Defendant recognized all of his criminal acts and is in profoundly against the Defendant, the operating period seems to be relatively long, the Defendant does not have the same power (it is difficult to view it as the same kind of crime before 2008), and the Defendant is faithful to and will not stop such criminal acts again.
In full view of the circumstances such as the fact that there is a serious mind, there is a well-being of the defendant.
I seem to appear.
In addition, for about six months, the defendant had time to seriously reflect his or her mistake while living in prison for about six months.
In full view of such circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
B. Defendant B and C recognize the instant crime and reflect their own mistake in depth.
In addition, it seems that the defendant A was involved in the crime of this case, and it seems that the defendant A did not receive substantial profits.
However, the Defendants’ share of the game of this case in the game of this case may be deemed to be less than the nature of the crime as an essential task for the crime of this case.
shall not be deemed to exist.
In addition, considering the degree of harm and injury inflicted on society, the defendants' participation is corresponding to the degree of each participation.