logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2016.02.04 2014허7608
거절결정(특)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On June 12, 2012, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office (hereinafter referred to as “the patent application invention of this case”) submitted an amendment, such as a description of correction of the description and claims on September 12, 2012, to the Plaintiffs on the following grounds: “The nonobviousness of the patent application invention of this case is denied since the person with ordinary knowledge in the art to which the invention pertains (hereinafter “ordinary technician”) can easily make the invention from the preceding invention 1 and 2; and thus, the patent cannot be granted. 2) The Plaintiffs submitted an amendment, such as a description of correction of the description and claims on September 12, 2012. However, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office, on January 24, 2013, submitted the amendment, on the ground that the nonobviousness of the patent application of this case was denied from the preceding invention 1 and 2.

3) On April 12, 2013, the Plaintiffs filed a petition with the Intellectual Property Tribunal for a trial seeking revocation of the aforementioned decision of rejection (2013 Won2744). On September 23, 2014, the Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered the instant trial ruling dismissing the Plaintiffs’ petition for a trial on the ground that the nonobviousness is denied since ordinary technicians could easily make inventions from prior inventions 1. B. The title of the instant patent application invention (Evidence A, No. 2 No. B. 1) invention: An Monoclonomy (Monoclonomy) invention: A single object: a body corresponding only to only one resistance decision, and its method 2) the filing date/ application number of the instant Claim for a trial on the ground that ordinary technicians could have easily made inventions from prior inventions 1; and the title of the instant patent application invention (Evidence A. 2, No. B. 1) invention ought to play an important role in the activation of Momo cell et al. al. 20-10/301 of Mo cell cells cells.

There are four kinds according to the function.

and any other cell type surface existing on the CD6 CD6: Clusster.

6. A few B cell chronic firs.

arrow