A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 09:20 on June 8, 2016, the Defendant, while driving Yab, was requested by F, etc. to present a driver’s license to impose a fine for negligence on the Haba while driving YA, the Defendant called “F,” stating, “I would like to stop the breath, to stop the breath, to stop the breath, to stop the breath, to stop the breath, to go through the police station. I tried to open a police breath and get on board, and F would put the Defendant’s arms and stop the Defendant who wanting to board the police breath, to stop the Defendant on board the police breath.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties to maintain the road traffic safety of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and G;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration, such as the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit the crime in this case and reflects the fact that the defendant has no criminal record of probation or heavier);