All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended execution in August, and two years of suspended execution in one year of imprisonment) declared by the court below is too unfasible and unfair.

2. In light of the following facts: (a) the facts that the nature of the crime of this case is not less desirable in light of the period and amount of the loan, size of the lending company, interest rate, etc., are disadvantageous to the Defendants; (b) on the other hand, the Defendants recognized all the facts charged of this case and against their mistake; (c) all the Defendants were paid monthly wages and allowances from Jeonju D; and (d) most of the profits from the crime of this case appears to have been acquired D; (c) upon the commencement of the investigation of this case, the Defendants voluntarily retired from their service related to credit business, and will continue to work and live in good faith in the future; (d) Defendant B was detained and detained for a nearby period of two months; (e) Defendant B had no record of crime; and (e) Defendant B did not have any criminal records like or beyond the same kind of fine; and (e) Defendant B’s age, character, conduct, environment records and pleadings were revealed, the Prosecutor’s assertion that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable, and thus, cannot be justified.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.