Defendant

A Imprisonment for four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2016, at around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) stopped a nearby vehicle on the front side of a bus bus terminal located in Pyeongtaek-gun, Gyeong-gun; and (b) reported the driving of the victim B (35 years old) to the police by drinking alcohol; (c) was inflicted an injury on the victim, i.e., a non-finc that requires approximately four weeks of treatment on the face of the victim due to drinking.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, Defendant B and the victim A (29 years) suffered injury, as described in paragraph 1, Defendant B and the victim’s head flapsed, and flapsed the victim’s head flapsed, and flapsed the face and body into the right flaps, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A medical certificate of injury (B) and a medical certificate of injury (A);

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines against Defendant A and Defendant B

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) (Defendant B) of the Criminal Act (Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B);

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “Defendant A”) reflects all of the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing, and the Defendants do not want any further punishment among each other by mutual consent, the degree of injury of Defendant B was not much serious, Defendant B committed during the suspended execution period of punishment due to violent crimes, Defendant B committed 16 times prior convictions, Defendant A had three times prior convictions, such as the distribution of obscene materials, and Defendant A’s distribution of obscene materials.