beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant and the Victim C (86) in the facts charged do not live together with the offender and the Victim C (86) as the relationship between the Siluri and Silan, and the relationship between them without any contact for ten years.
On April 2, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim, who was in the Defendant’s residence of Kimpo-si D, 201 Dong 201-dong 201, by pushing the victim out of the entrance door with his hand and body by pushing the victim out of the entrance door, making the victim face side of the wall side of the elevator.
2. Determination
A. The record reveals the following facts.
① The Defendant, her husband’s son’s son and her husband’s son’s son and her husband’s son, led to the Defendant’s withdrawal of money, saying that the victim would not open a door to the home.
② At the time of committing the instant crime, the victim experienced the Defendant’s initial seal and repeated the hidden impression in the Gu seat.
③ The Defendant heard several first class sounds and asked guards E to check out the outside of the entrance, even though he/she had confirmed the outside of the entrance, and to check out the outside of the entrance, and request the guards E to check out of the entrance.
E has confirmed the existence of a victim in the future of the present question, and the defendant has been deadly.
Information was known.
(4) The Defendant: (a) opened a front door and entered into the front door; and (b) flaps of the victim.
Accordingly, the defendant sent the victim out of the door with his hand and body.
(5) After the victim comes out of the front door, the defendant tried to close the front door with the front door, and the victim was faced with the elevator, etc. at the front door in the situation where the victim intends to open the front door, and the victim was faced with the victim (the police investigation protocol on the victim's suspect who seems to meet the facts charged that the victim exceeded the victim because the defendant was sealed, the victim's testimony in this court is unclear, and the defendant and witness E are contrary thereto.