beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) A, Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant), Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) C, Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) D, and Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff; hereinafter the Defendant is only the Defendant) is a company engaged in the integrated management business of cleaning, labor, landscaping, and building facilities, and the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant; hereinafter the Plaintiff is only the Plaintiff) is an employee employed by the Defendant company for the period indicated in the “work period column” of the unpaid annual allowance in attached Table 1.
B. A majority of the plaintiffs worked for the defendant company even prior to the aforementioned “work period” entry period, and received 675,000 won in total including basic pay of KRW 648,00 and annual salary of KRW 27,500 from July 201, and retired on or after the end of July 2011.
C. From August 201 to December 201, 201, the Plaintiffs received the total of KRW 662,40, annual allowances of KRW 32,400, annual allowances of KRW 52,000, the total of KRW 750,000, annual allowances of KRW 683,60, annual allowances of KRW 29,70, annual allowances of KRW 56,700, annual allowances of KRW 56,700, annual allowances of KRW 56,70, May 201, to KRW 305, annual allowances of KRW 709,560, annual allowances of KRW 30,983, KRW 61,712, and KRW 805, annual allowances of KRW 802,50,000, KRW 6365,065, May 26, 2014, and KRW 360,6365,065, annual allowances of KRW 75,20165,6365.
(However, the position allowances of 3-50,000 won are additionally paid to the Plaintiff A, C, Plaintiff D, Plaintiff M, and Plaintiff V) (based on recognition) and the entry in the evidence Nos. 1 and 23
2. The assertion;
A. Although it was true that the Defendant paid a certain amount as retirement allowance and annual allowance when paying monthly salary, the Plaintiffs are in violation of Article 8 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits and Article 60 of the Labor Standards Act, which are mandatory provisions, and thus invalid.
Therefore, the defendant should pay the unpaid annual allowance and retirement allowance to the plaintiffs.
B. The counterclaim Defendant shall pay the annual allowance and the retirement allowance in installments each month.