logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.12.28 2018나2043478
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff is modified as follows.

In the instant lawsuit, the construction cost is claimed.

Reasons

A. Of the claim amount, part of the Plaintiff’s claim amount of KRW 227,950,231 (i.e., KRW 62,214,861, KRW 165,735,370) is used as a seizure of the Plaintiff’s claim for the construction payment against the Defendant, as seen in the part of determination as to whether the Plaintiff’s claim for the construction payment was lawful. Of these, the amount used in real seizure is KRW 39,163,673, as seen in the list of damages for delay of the claim for the construction payment as follows.

In calculating damages for delay, the principal of the Plaintiff’s actual claim for the construction work against the Defendant is KRW 258 million and the Plaintiff’s additional amount of KRW 8,1290,000,000, KRW 3339290,000,000, KRW 367.36,000, KRW 296.36,000, KRW 1666, 296.36, 296, 27.16, 36,36, 196, 296, 27.6, 36, 296, 27, 36, 196, 36, 296, 27, 296, 36, 47, 296, 296, 36, 136, 1375, 297, 196, 257, 197

Therefore, this case.

arrow