logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2021.02.19 2020고단2042
편의시설부정이용
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of the B vehicle with interest.

No person shall acquire any property or property benefits using a package on an expressway which is a charged automatic facility without paying the price by an unlawful means.

Nevertheless, on February 14, 2014, the Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to 2,248,500 won (in addition to tolls 226,500,022,000 won) by using an expressway through the business office located in Ansan-si, Seoul, and using the expressway as a fee-free automatic facility without charging a charge on the electronic card inserted in the Habsp terminal and passing through the Habsp terminal as well as by using the expressway with a total of 135 times until October 29, 2018, as indicated in the daily list of crimes in the attached Table, by passing the expressway business office and passing through the expressway with a total of 135 times until October 29, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Motor Vehicle Registration Register;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 348-2 of the Criminal Act selecting a sentence, and the choice of a fine;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract the Nowon-gu Station was that the Defendant passed the lane without permission over 135 times.

However, the defendant's mistake, the fact that 1.4 million won was paid on the date immediately before the date of sentencing, the fact that the actual tolls was 26,50 won, the remainder of 2,02,00 won was an additional toll, the fact that the defendant was issued a summary order three times as a crime of the same kind, but is not a crime committed even after he was issued a summary order due to a crime similar to this case, the fact that there was no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine, and other various sentencing conditions shall be determined as the same as the order.

arrow