logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2020.04.16 2020고단49
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On January 22, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million at the Cheongju District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving the Grandroth Corresponding in violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury)

On October 23, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol on 06:05, the blood alcohol concentration of 0.158%, was driven by the gold-raising school as a gold officer's room in the Yellow Park.

At this point, since it is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver engaged in the driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well with the front line and to operate the steering and brakes accurately.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of the Defendant, who was negligent in not operating the brake system properly, and was under the influence of the victim C (the age of 68) who was parked in order to signal the atmosphere, and received the front section of the Victim C (the age of 68) driving, as the front section of the Grandroth.

As a result, the Defendant, while driving in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, suffered from the injury of the victim E (the 63 years old), such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of light care for about two weeks, and suffered from the injury of the victim E (the 63 years old) who was on board the rocketing and other automobiles.

2. Although the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) even though he had the history of violating the prohibition of drunk driving, the Defendant was driving a bus in the form of 0.158% of the blood alcohol concentration on the section of about 1km from the front of the parking lot of the F building at the time of racing to the place specified in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow