logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.03.21 2018고단8328
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2018, from around 01:5 to around 02:10 on the same day, the Defendant avoided the victim’s taxi operation service by avoiding disturbance, such as turning off the said taxi driver, on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol from around 01:5 to around 01:10 on the roads in front of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and that “the said taxi driver has a lot of complaints against the taxi driver,” thereby obstructing the victim’s taxi operation service by force.

around 02:30 on September 8, 2018, the Defendant brought out the F convenience store located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, without calculating beer, brought out the beer, and followed by the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as plucking, plucking, plicking, plucking, 2 times the course of the victim, plicking, plucking, plucking, plucking, etc., of the victim, who was an employee of the above convenience store (Nam, 19 years old).

"2019 Highest 369"

1. On December 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 03:45, in front of Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul, the Defendant: (b) expressed that, even though the victim was going to a mutually beneficial private taxi operated by the victim I and was going to a mutually beneficial police station, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s above taxi door in order to have the victim 631,145 won away from the front right door and the rear door of the said taxi as one time after getting out of the taxi, on the ground that the victim’s searchs the route of operation without immediately departing from it, on the ground that “I do not know whether I do not know it, and you do not know it, at the same time.”

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim on the ground that the victim I (Nam, 51) resisted the above Defendant’s act and reported it to the police at the time, place, and at the same time as the above paragraph, and on the ground that he reported it to the police, on the part of the victim, on two occasions.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 8328"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Report on investigation by the prosecution (booms video)" 2018 Godan8525;

1. The defendant;

arrow