The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is innocent.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles accused D himself as embezzlement and brought a civil suit against D, upon request of D to arbitrate an agreement with D and request of F and D to mediate an agreement with the two parties.

However, at the time, the demand note, such as the fine for negligence, etc., of the call brace vehicle operated by DF, continues to be reached in the future, and if it is not resolved, it would not be agreed, and F would be agreed upon by using the debit card under the former name of D to resolve the issue of fine for negligence by using it. The Defendant testified as it is.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty or erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant was present at the court of Incheon District Court No. 412, which is located in Nam-dong, Incheon, in order to take an oath as a witness of the larceny case against D, No. 2011No. 37, which is located in Nam-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon, and raised a perjury against memory as follows.