A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The Defendant, who is engaged in the reconstruction implementation business of the Daegu North-gu D apartment, stated that “The Defendant would remove the Plaintiff’s office in the G office of the victim F management corporation located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the first order of February 2010, that “The expenses for the reconstruction will be the removal of the mother and child operating expenses, and the Defendant would have to pay the borrowed money without fail.”

However, the Defendant entered into a removal construction contract on February 18, 2010 with the victim and received KRW 25 million from the victim on February 25, 2010. On the same day, the Defendant entered into a contract for the removal of the above D Apartment and borrowed KRW 445 million from the above Scar City, and stated that the Defendant did not have any intent to reduce the removal to the victim company. Although he was suspected of disposal, the Defendant did not receive KRW 34 million from 70,000 from 0,000,000,000 from 0,000,000 won from 20,000,000 won from 7,000,000 won from 0,0000 won from 20,000,000 won from 20,000,000 won from 20,000,000 won from 20,000,000 won from 20,00.