1. The Defendant: KRW 35,746,422 to Plaintiff A; KRW 33,772,311 to Plaintiff B; KRW 32,631,182 to Plaintiff C; and KRW 34,485 to Plaintiff D.

1. Basic facts

A. From March 1, 2016, the Plaintiffs began to work as a medical specialist in the family department at the F Hospital run by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) (in the case of a family department, a training course is conducted to obtain qualifications for a medical specialist at a hospital, etc., and a three-year training period is required for a medical specialist without a personal internship course in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Regulations on Training, Recognition of Qualification, etc.) and worked until February 28, 2019.

B. Meanwhile, with respect to the subjects of study on family medicine, the Presidential Decree of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, which was enacted pursuant to the Regulations on the Training, Certification, etc. of Qualifications for Medical Specialists, provides that the subject of study on family medicine shall be subject to the exclusive training for not less than six months, and that the subject of study on family medicine shall be subject to the compulsory major, by stipulating “in-house, infant juvenile department, obstetrician department, surgery, surgery, and other essential selective subjects” and “free selective subjects” so that the subject of education on dispatched circulation may be conducted. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs received training in the above essential major department, including the ney, internal medicine, internal medicine, and internal medicine.

C. From March 1, 2016 to February 28, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as “instant work period”), the Plaintiffs provided additional watchkeeping in accordance with the training schedule during the regular work hours (08:30 to 17:30) at the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter referred to as “instant work period”). From March 1, 2016 to February 28, 2018, the Plaintiffs were on duty in the pertinent department during the period of receiving dispatched education from other departments, as described in the foregoing paragraph (b).

The statutes related to the instant case are as stated in the attached Form “related Acts and subordinate statutes.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 18 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the employer is obligated to pay additional wages under the Labor Standards Act;

A. The plaintiffs 1 plaintiffs are under the direction and supervision of the defendant hospital.