1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 33,418,390 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from November 22, 2013 to December 20, 2013.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”) to compensate workers for occupational accidents in a prompt and fair manner, install and operate necessary insurance facilities, etc. The Plaintiff is a special corporation that carries on the business, and the Defendant A is the driver of the Mt Vehicle B (hereinafter “MM”) and the insurer that concluded an insurance contract with respect to the L/C.

B. At around 13:50 on January 21, 201, Defendant A neglected the duty of care to reduce the speed and temporarily stop the vehicle in the direction of the Grand apartment in order to verify whether there is a cross-section by driving a sea-going vehicle at an intersection, which is an intersection where traffic control is not performed, and due to the negligence of the victim C’s DNA, which was proceeding on the left-hand side of the sea-going vehicle for delivery, and the left-hand side part of the vehicle in front of the sea-going vehicle, and thereby, the victim suffered injury, such as open pulverization that is accompanied by a fluor fluor hand, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

By November 22, 2013, the Plaintiff paid respectively KRW 46,171,30 of temporary layoff benefits and KRW 73,077,690 of medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act to the victims.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the facts of the recognition of the above 1nd liability for damages and the occurrence of the right to indemnity, Defendant A is a tort, and the interesting State Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the victim due to the occurrence of the accident in each of the instant case as an insurer who concluded an insurance contract on the harming vehicles, and the Plaintiff who paid the insurance benefits to the victim pursuant to the Industrial Accident Insurance Act.