logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.12.19 2014나4300
임대차보증금
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 24, 2009, the Plaintiff leased the leased object KRW 140 million from the Defendant’s multi-household house in Guri-si (hereinafter “multi-household house in this case”) and KRW 140 million from the fourth floor office (hereinafter “the leased object in this case”) and the lease period from July 10, 2009 to 24 months.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

Upon the expiration of the lease term stipulated in the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, on the premise that the said lease term has expired, concluded a lease contract with a new lessee and received the lease deposit, the Defendant would return the lease deposit to the Plaintiff by paying it to the new lessee.

around March 2012, the Defendant received KRW 1 million from the new lessee of the instant multi-household 301, which was the Plaintiff, but the said new lessee did not enter into a lease agreement with the Defendant, and waived the said provisional contract amount.

C. On November 19, 2012, the Plaintiff lent KRW 10 million to the Defendant.

(hereinafter “instant loan”). D.

On November 28, 2012, the Plaintiff leased the instant multi-household B106 unit to KRW 2 million, monthly rent of KRW 300,000,000,000 from the Defendant. On December 27, 2012, the Plaintiff terminated the said lease contract and delivered the said unit to the Defendant.

E. On January 8, 2013, the Defendant remitted KRW 10 million to the Plaintiff for the repayment of the instant loan, and on March 13, 2013, the Defendant transferred KRW 1.7 million after deducting the unpaid rent of KRW 3 million as the refund of the lease deposit under the instant lease agreement, and on March 13, 2013, the Defendant deposited KRW 120 million for the remainder of the lease deposit under the instant lease agreement with the District Court Decision 2015Da1258 Decided the Plaintiff as the principal deposit on the 19th of the same month.

F. On April 20, 2013, the Plaintiff’s leased object to the Defendant.

arrow