1. As to the corporeal movables recorded in the separate sheet dated February 20, 2012 by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a stock company with the purpose of manufacturing stone, and the Defendant is a stock company with the purpose of leasing business.

B. On February 20, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into the instant lease agreement with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with regard to the chain period indicated in the attached list (hereinafter “instant chain”).

On February 29, 2012, the Plaintiff received a performance guarantee insurance policy (payment) from the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul Guarantee Insurance”) to guarantee the payment of rent, etc. to the Defendant, and delivered it to the Defendant.

Article 1 (Location of Place of Work and Rental) 1) Installation of a crushed stone string and use of it shall be in the place of use, e.g., Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, in the place of use of it (hereinafter referred to as the “instant site”).

2) To this end, the Plaintiff’s expenses incurred to dissolve the leased object and install it at the place of use after the end of the lease.

Article 2 (Period of Lease) The term of lease shall be determined from April 2012 to April 2013, and the period of use may be extended under mutual consultation.

Provided, That the dissolution and transfer of the object of lease shall be made by the month - the date of transfer, and the plaintiff shall submit to the defendant the full amount of the deposit or contract performance bond and rent.

Article 4 (Rent) (1) Rent shall be determined monthly as KRW 26 million (excluding value-added tax), regardless of whether the subject matter is operated, and shall be paid in advance on a monthly-day basis. (2) In the event that the Plaintiff fails to use the leased object to reach the basic operating hours, the monthly rent shall be paid to the Defendant, and where the Plaintiff intends to use it in excess of the basic operating hours, the excess hours shall be subject to consultation with the Defendant separately.

3. Where the plaintiff has failed to operate continuously for at least three consecutive days, the rent shall be determined by mutual agreement.