The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (4 million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is against the depth of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant should consider equity with the case of concurrent crimes under Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act in relation to the concurrent crimes between the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Epiking Vehicles) in the judgment of the court below and the latter part of Article 37

However, in full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant had been driving without obtaining a license for driving without obtaining a license for driving without obtaining a license; (b) leaving the scene without taking necessary measures; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance after the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.