The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include the fact that the Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime, and some of the circumstances that led to the instant crime are considered.

On the other hand, in 200, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 500,000 won as a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving), and in 2003, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years in October, 200, such as violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (Ling Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (Ling Vehicle) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (Ling Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (Ling Vehicle) and violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Ling Vehicle), violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Ling Vehicle), violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Ling Vehicle), violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Ling Vehicle), and violation of the Road Traffic Act (Ling Vehicle without Permission).

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and the environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable and unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.