1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 8, 2000, net G (Death on September 27, 2010) and Defendant D established the Defendant Company for the purpose of manufacturing industrial automation machinery.

B. At the time of the establishment of the Defendant Company, the representative director, H, I, and auditor were listed as the Plaintiff. Of the 200,000 shares of the Defendant Company (1 share amounting to KRW 5,000, capital amounting to KRW 100,000, capital amounting to KRW 100,000), the net G acquired 80,000 shares, and the Plaintiff Company’s 20,00 shares, respectively, and H, who received title trust from Defendant D, acquired 80,00 shares, and 20,00 shares, respectively.

C. On April 6, 2001, the net G is the representative director of the defendant company, the plaintiff A is the auditor of the defendant company, the plaintiff A withdraws from the director of the defendant company, and the defendant D is the representative director of the defendant company on April 6, 2001, the defendant D is the representative director of the defendant company, the I is the auditor of the defendant company, and the defendant E is the representative director of the defendant company, and the defendant E is the director of the defendant company.

In around 2001, 80,000 shares of the Defendant Company in the name of deceased G were transferred to Defendant E, and around 2002, around 2002, the shares of Defendant Company A in the name of Plaintiff A were transferred to Defendant E.

E. After that, 200,000 shares of Defendant E’s company were transferred to Defendant D.

F. Plaintiff A is the spouse of the network G, and Plaintiff B and C are children of the network G.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy facts, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 2-2, Eul evidence 2-5-1, Eul evidence 6, Eul evidence 7-1 through 3-3, witness J's testimony, result of order of submission of tax information to the director of the tax office at issue of this court, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion G is a shareholder with 80,000 shares of the Defendant Company, and 20,000 shares of the Defendant Company, and 34,285 shares of the net G out of 80,000 shares of the deceased G due to the death of the network G, respectively, to the Plaintiff A, and 22,857 shares of the Plaintiff and C.