All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendants committed an illegal act in order to support the right to manage the building of this case and removed the illegal advertisements attached by the victim H as they committed an illegal act, and the Defendants did not commit the crime of causing property damage, but the lower court convicted the Defendants, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

Judgment

In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, namely, K and L to which the Defendants belonged, were under the continuous legal dispute surrounding the instant building; ② the Defendants were also the police officer, and the Defendants also removed the general assembly notice, notice of payment of management expenses, etc. attached to the elevator of the instant building, etc. under the direction of B; and the video, etc. of the photograph taken above correspond to the statement of the victim H’s damage. The lower court’s determination that the Defendants damaged the victim’s property is justifiable, and thus, the Defendants’ assertion on this part is not acceptable.

In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the defendants are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.