A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 01:30 on May 26, 2017, at around 01:0, at the 3 main week E located in Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-si, the Defendant had a dispute with the victim C (31 years of age) and her drinking during drinking. During that process, the Defendant was suffering from her disease, which is a dangerous object for the reason that the victim was waiting for the Defendant, and the victim was “dlehhhhhhhhhh”.

“Along with the defect, the part of the victim’s left part of the other beer’s disease was laid together with another beer, and when the victim’s left part was taken one time with the victim’s left hand, the victim had a deep heat (including the pelletin) of the left part in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates and injury medical certificates;

1. Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 32(1)3 and 32(2) and 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuit for Dismissal of Application for Compensation (the scope of liability to compensate is not clear, and thus, it is not reasonable to issue an order for compensation in the criminal procedure of this case) on the grounds of sentencing, in light of the method and result of the instant crime, etc.

However, it is decided as ordered by taking into account the following factors: the defendant is against himself, the defendant paid 1.5 million won to the victim for the recovery of damage, the fact that there is no same record and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the circumstances of the crime, circumstances after the crime, age and environment of the defendant.