The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Improper sentencing of the summary of reasons for appeal: The sentence of the lower court (six years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The circumstances cited by the court below (the defendant was first aware of the victim's child who lives in neighboring areas or was living in neighboring areas; the victim's child was living in the home of the victim's parent with his/her own child; and other family members had sexual intercourse with the victim by force.

After committing the crime, the Defendant continuously want to look at the victim, “I wish to do so,” “I wish to do so,” “I am well-friendly and well-known,” and “I am in Han River.”

The message and correspondence containing the content of “” were sent to the victim, and the victim did not refuse the sexual intercourse even at the court of the original instance.

It is difficult to find out a strong attitude of reflection, such as assertion.

The victim appears to have suffered considerable mental impulse and pain due to the crime of this case, and is likely to have negative impacts on the formation of sound sexual identity and values in the future.

The victim and the mother of the victim want to punish both the defendant and the defendant, as above, and the defendant tried to have sexual intercourse or sexual intercourse over several occasions with the victim who is not able to properly distinguish 13 years of age since the victim's father's father's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's

In full view of the circumstances revealed by the record, including the fact that the sentence imposed by the court below is close to the lower limit of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines and there is no change of circumstances in the trial at the same time, the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant shall be less light of the sentence imposed by the defendant.

It is too heavy to see.