beta
Text
1. The Seoul Central District Court 201Kahap20589 claim against the plaintiff by the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed parties.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the designated parties D, E, C, B, and network N (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”) have completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 9, 200 on the grounds of inheritance by agreement division on October 23, 1993, following the death of the MM, who had owned the said land, and 1/7 shares of each of the said forests.
B. On November 28, 2008, the Plaintiff completed the registration of modification of each right to collateral security that changes the maximum debt amount of KRW 250,000,000 to KRW 375,000 on July 23, 2009. On September 11, 2009, the Plaintiff completed the registration of modification of each right to collateral security that changes the maximum debt amount of KRW 150,000,000 to P with respect to the Plaintiff’s share of each of the said forests.
After that, P transferred his joint mortgage on each of the above real estate to Q Q on February 8, 201, and completed the registration of transfer of each right to collateral security on the same day.
C. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff and the Defendant et al. did not reach an agreement on the division of each of the above forests and fields, and the Plaintiff did not file a lawsuit against the Defendant et al. for land division claim under the court 2007Kadan459394, and the Plaintiff appealed with this court 2008Na38706. On November 10, 2009, this court rendered a judgment on November 10, 2009 that “the Plaintiff owned the Plaintiff, etc. for 22 square meters of the 154 square meters of the 154 square meters of the 154 square meters of the 154 square meters of the 154 square meters of the 152 square meters of the 132 square meters of the 19,680 square meters of the 19,680 square meters of the L forest and field (S division) and the remaining 16,869 square meters of the 19,000 square meters of the 100 square meters of the 1.
On February 15, 2011, the Defendant et al. against the right to collateral security established with respect to the share of 1/7 square meters in K forest and L forest and 16,869 square meters, which is the right to collateral security with respect to the share of 1/7 square meters in the area of the wife population, as the right to collateral security established between the Defendant and Q, as the right to collateral security.