Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

72,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On January 12, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of three years in Seoul High Court due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 16, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On February 2, 2012, the Defendant, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council, knew that D’s believers of the above church, which was prosecuted for fraud and was detained in the Seoul Central District Court, was investigated into another fraudulent case at the office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the above church, told the victim E, who is the branch office of D, would be subject to the

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he thought that he will use it for an individual purpose, and there was no intention or ability to force the prosecutor to make the above D to be subject to a non-suspected disposition.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 20 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant on February 17, 2012 in return for solicitation of public officials.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables from the victim on the pretext of soliciting the case handled by the public officials at the same time.

2. On February 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) known the fact that the said D filed an appeal against the instant case with the Seoul Central District Court; and (b) told the said victim E to the effect that “The said Doz is a G attorney of Frop; (c) made DNA solicitation to the Justice in charge through G attorney-at-law to release D not guilty; (d) changed at school expense KRW 52 million.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he was thought to use it for an individual purpose, and was not a relative of G attorney-at-law, and he was acquitted of D in favor of the Justice in charge.