1. The Defendant: (a) for the Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s 85,52,647 won and KRW 75,00,000 from June 25, 2016 to 10,52.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties are sectional owners who purchase each of the following units from the Defendant of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel (hereinafter “instant Officetel”).

Plaintiff

The successor intervenor is a management body established with the objective of carrying out the business management of building and its site and its annexed facilities by making all sectional owners of the instant officetels as members of the sectional owners.

Plaintiff 1 C 202 B B 60, B 70 5 B B 1, B 60, B 60, B 70 5 B 60, B 701 57 2, H 706 2, 305 304 604 204 504 404 504 404 204 604 604 204 605 60 6405 605 205 2405 605 205 2405 705 706 306 306 306 405 705 705 6306 306 4017 2017 304 406

(2) On July 23, 2015, the instant officetel is a construction company that constructed the instant officetel under a contract with the Defendant. 2) From the judgment of the relevant case to the Defendant and the Tae-Tai-type case, a claim suit, such as the settlement amount between the Defendant and the Tae-Tai-type case (the U.S. District Court, the U.S. District Court, 2013Gahap2191, 2013Gahap8370 (Counterclaim), 2015. 1, 25, 6, 9-12, 14, 18, 20, 23, 32, 38, 39, 41, 42, 48-50, 53, 54, and additional defects in attached Form 1, 25, 60, 9-12, 14, 18, 25, and 52.