logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.01.16 2017고정386
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 25, 2017, at around 02:00, the Defendant destroyed an inner door door door that could not identify the market price owned by the next victim on several occasions on the ground that the victim E, his spouse, remains locked by locking the door door from the old-si, Si, Si, Do, the domicile of the Defendant, around 02:00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A report on internal investigation (as to the situation of dispatch to the scene);

1. Chapter Four copies of the photograph (the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court may be acknowledged as the Defendant’s damage to the inner mold as indicated in its reasoning, taking into account the following circumstances.

(1) A victim is visiting the defendant.

A report is filed with 112, stating to the effect that “A police officer dispatched to the Republic of Korea was destroyed by a door mold as stated in its reasoning after having made a report, and after having made a statement on such fact, the Defendant’s visit was destroyed in a specific and consistent manner from the police investigation to this Court.

Considering the details and contents of the victim's report 112, the conversation between the police officer dispatched by the victim upon receipt of the first report and the victim's attitude at that time, it seems that the victim's above statement seems to be reliable.

② Although the victim brought a divorce lawsuit against the Defendant after the instant case, the victim did not seem to have prepared the lawsuit at the time of the instant case, and there are no other relevant materials to deem that the injured party was dead of the Defendant’s property and reported the same as the Defendant’s assertion, as otherwise alleged by the Defendant).

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. On February 25, 2017, the Defendant, at around 02:00, opened a buck door from the old-si D and the fourth floor where the Defendant’s residence is the Defendant, and opened two bucks of the victim E (the age of 54).

arrow