The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the crime, the fact that the Defendant disposes of the vehicle and did not repeat the crime, the fact that there is a child to support the wife and the supported by the A upper-tier cancer, and that there is no criminal record.

However, in full view of the fact that the Defendant had been punished three times due to driving without a license, and that each of the crimes of this case was committed without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was committed during the suspension period due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault by a driver), and that the Defendant was extremely bad in the quality of the crime, such as driving a vehicle in drinking or without a license, and demanding B to make a false statement in order to conceal the fact, and other circumstances, which are the sentencing conditions appearing in the records and arguments of this case, such as the Defendant’s character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to have exceeded a reasonable discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.