logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.03.10 2016가단240177
토지명도 등
Text

1. Defendant B:

A. At the same time, 100,000 square meters are paid from the Plaintiff, and at the same time, 768 square meters in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

Reasons

1. On April 23, 2010, Plaintiff B, who indicated the claim, leased the land indicated in the order (hereinafter “instant land”) with the lease deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 900,000,000,000 from May 3, 2010 to May 3, 2012, the lease deposit of KRW 10,000,000 from the said Defendant is received from the said Defendant. The lease continues to exist as the lease without a fixed period, as it continues implicitly to be renewed even after the lease term expires.

om. From November 30, 2016 to November 30, 2016, 9.9 million won (i.e., KRW 9 million) in arrears, and upon delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case by Plaintiff B, Defendant B notified Defendant B of the termination of the lease on the ground of delinquency in rent (e.g., arrival of December 14, 2016). The possession of the instant land without Defendant C’s legitimate title. The obligation to transfer the instant land upon termination of the lease agreement and to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the instant land rent or rent. 2. Determination based on each deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow