1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 10,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from March 2, 2018 to January 15, 2021 and from the next day.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 8, 2016, the Plaintiff, as a congenital rare disease spomulma group, sought a hospital operated by the Defendant (a specialized department sexual surgery, non-spores, non-spores, and imposition, etc.) for correction of the name of both relics.

At the time, the defendant explained to the plaintiff that "the plaintiff's neighboring land difference, c l son's name, and b b son's name should not be resolved, the left-hand side can be raised, the right-hand side can be lowered, but the b b son's name should not be replaced, and the size of both sides can be different, but the b b son's name should not be replaced, but in order to meet the size of both sides, the 325 cc square in the shape of the b c l r r l l b l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

B. On November 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) performed the instant primary surgery to the Plaintiff on the right-hand refluoring (by means of the improvement of the winter, inserting the shape of the Belgium M 240C in the following water-proof lux M 240cc; hereinafter “the instant primary surgery”).

(c)1)

On May 2, 2017, in order to correct the Plaintiff’s size and location change on both sides, the Defendant: (a) replaced the right bank square water with a light larger than the early light water; (b) inserted the left bank square, and (c) carried out the first hosting of the left-hand one (hereinafter “the second operating”).

2) During the process observation of the instant secondary surgery, the Plaintiff caused the Plaintiff’s formation leader around the left-hand wheels. The Defendant, on May 20, 2017, removed the Plaintiff’s removal and re-furning of the tampion. On June 30, 2017, removed the upper-hand chest on the right-hand chest.

(d)1)

On August 11, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant for a pass on the left-hand hand, and asked whether the left-hand hand can not be added.

Therefore, the defendant is difficult to open to the left-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-on, and does not recommend it.

I explained.

2) On September 22, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant for a transcript on the left-hand side.

3) The Plaintiff left the left-hand side of the Defendant on November 17, 2017.