The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The penalty (20 million won) imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as an element of sentencing were revealed in the hearing process of the lower court and sufficiently considered. There was no particular change in the situation that is the condition of sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment.

In addition, in full view of all the factors such as the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant had committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he had been punished for drunk driving even around 2016, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, the circumstances and motive leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing is too excessive to exceed the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.