A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 12, 2016, the Defendant called “C”, which is an Internet game site, at a place where it is not known around December 12, 2016, and the Defendant said that “on deposit with the victim D by means of one-day dialogue in the game, the Defendant would transfer the game money.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to transfer the game money.

The defendant deceivings the victim by the above method, and acquired 29,000 won through a new bank account (Account Number E) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim, and acquired it by transfer from the victim, and also received 1,493,900 won in total on 22 occasions from the above date to January 25, 2017, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 20.

The Defendant, “2017 Highest 613,” as a person subject to the call-up of social service personnel, did not respond to the call-up by the date on which three days elapsed from the date of call-up without justifiable grounds, even though he received a notice of call-up under the name of the head of the Seoul Regional Military Affairs Administration to call-up to the Army Training Center located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Military Manpower Administration located in the 43-gil-ro, Seoul Military Manpower Administration on November 25, 2016, and the Seoul Regional Military Manpower Administration on December 14:00 on December 8, 2016.

The Defendant, on November 22, 2016, of “2017 Highest 797, the Defendant,” by means of Kakao Stockholm message, received monthly pay from the victim F that he/she became aware of through a game at a place unknown to him/her on November 22, 2016, until December 8, 2016.

“.....”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he borrowed money from the victim to use it as living expenses, not as a living hospital, and because there was no particular income at the time, there was no intention or ability to repay it even if he borrowed money from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 100,00 from the victim’s new bank account in the name of the Defendant, and thereafter, received KRW 100,00 from that time until January 25, 2017.