The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant attempted to commit a sexual intercourse with the victim by implied consent of the victim, and there was no attempts to commit rape (related to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (related to the crime of quasi-rape, etc. of the disabled), and that the victim would bring the victim to pay his money to the defendant, and that the defendant has not stolen the place of the above prohibition from the victim.

[Relationship with thief] Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted all of the charges of this case against the defendant is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below has denied all facts charged in this case from the court below to the purport as alleged in the grounds for appeal, and the court below rejected the defendant's assertion in addition to a detailed judgment under the title of "judgment on the defendant and his defense counsel". The summary of the judgment is as follows.

- 원심의 판시 요지 - ▣ 성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인준강간등)의 점에 관하여, 피해자는 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서 “피고인은 피해자의 집 안에 들어와 업고 있던 피해자를 내려놓은 후, 술에 취하여 고꾸라진 피해자의 입술을 빨고, 가슴을 만지며, 피해자의 바지와 팬티를 벗겼다. 이에 피해자가 피고인을 머리, 손 및 발 등으로 밀쳐내려고 하였음에도 불구하고, 피고인이 피해자를 힘으로 제압하면서 피해자 위에 올라타 자신의 성기를 피해자의 음부에 가져가 비비면서 삽입하려고 하였으나, 발기가 되지 않았다.”라고 이 사건 장애인 준강간미수 범행 당시의 상황을 매우 구체적이고 일관되게 진술하였다.

The statements of the victim cannot be made unless the facts actually occurred or the person who made the statement did not experience.