A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 27, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective assault, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Jung-gu District Court on August 27, 2013. On January 3, 2014, the same court was sentenced to four months as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 21, 2014, and the sentence of the said suspension of execution was terminated on January 2, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 10:09 on April 8, 2015, the Defendant, while drunkly drunkd at “C” restaurant located in the Government-Si of Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, 112, and the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Gu Police Station D District Unit of the Gu Government Police Station that received 112 reports and dispatched, and the above restaurant employee F, etc. were heard by the Defendant, he publicly insultingd the victim with a large amount of the “nickt, Chewing tye, and nife, nife, nife, nife.e., nife”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. A complaint;

1. Criminal records as stated: The application of inquiry reports and investigation reports (Attachment of related cases) and statutes, including criminal records;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders is very high that the Defendant was punished by violence or obstruction of performance of official duties, damage to public goods, interference with business, etc., and the Defendant was also punished by a fine as an insulting crime; and the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime for which it has not yet passed after having been sentenced to imprisonment as stated in the judgment of the court; in light of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime, such as the record of the

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the facts of the crime and reflected is considered as favorable to the defendant, and the reason why the crime of this case was committed, the circumstances after the crime, and the defendant.