A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:20, around 18:20, the Defendant was able to her private taxi with an influence of drinking drinking to his own E-si; (b) however, the Defendant was able to get off the taxi at around 200 meters after driving it, resulting in a difference in the taxi fee and resulting in the difference in the defective restaurant.

The Defendant did not receive money from customers because he did not receive money from the president of the restaurant, and the victim G, who was a defective restaurant customer, said that “if he did not receive the fee, she would be satisfy in this box?” she satisfated, fatd and fatd the victim by making a fatch and fatd.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each statute on witness G, F, and H’s statutory statement;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion regarding the defendant under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the defendant's defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act constitutes an act that does not violate self-defense or social norms, since he was assaulted by the victim first, and thus, the defendant's act constitutes an act that does not violate self-defense or social norms. However, in light of the circumstance and contents of this case acknowledged by the evidence, and the degree of the type of force inflicted on the victim, etc., the defendant's act does not constitute an act that does